Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 12:27

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ford Stock Rises After Strong May Sales. The Pain Is Coming. - Barron's
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
‘Dirty Dozen’ 2025: The 12 Most Contaminated Fruits and Vegetables - Food & Wine
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Would you let your son wear leggings to school?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The "Tooth Hurty" Joke Has Its Origins In Ancient, Armored Fish - Defector
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.